AmphibiaWeb - Pipa parva


(Translations may not be accurate.)

Pipa parva Ruthven & Gaige, 1923
family: Pipidae
genus: Pipa

© 2007 Danté B Fenolio (1 of 7)

  hear call (813.0K WAV file)

[call details here]

Conservation Status (definitions)
IUCN Red List Status Account Least Concern (LC)
National Status None
Regional Status None



View distribution map in BerkeleyMapper.


Among pipids, P. parva is moderately small, with female snout-vent length (SVL) ranging from 27 to 44 mm and male SVL ranging from 28 to 37 mm. The head is narrow, with large eyes, and the snout is pointed. As is the case for all other pipids, the tongue is lacking, and the upper lip has a labial pocket at the angle of the jaw. Teeth are absent on both the pre-maxilla and maxilla (Trueb and Cannatella 1986). The body is slender and less depressed relative to other Pipa (Trueb and Cannatella 1986). The skin is covered with small protuberances, or tubercles, of varying size, density, and definition. On the head, tubercles tend to be smaller but uniform in size and distribution, while on the back they are dense and large. Upper surfaces of the limbs also have large tubercles, though not as numerous. Ventral tubercles are generally less prominent and less dense (MCZ specimens; Trueb and Cannatella 1986). On the feet, recurved spinose tubercles are present on the inner first toe and outer fifth toe, as well as on the tarsus, and smaller recurved spinose tubercles are present on the plantar surface (Trueb and Cannatella 1986).

The fingertips of Pipa generally and P. parva specifically are quite distinctive. Pipids have evolved uniquely modified lobes on the end of each fingertip, with the exact form and location of these lobes varying by species. Pipa parva displays four distinct lobes asymmetrically distributed on the fingertip. One pair of lobes is terminally located while the other is slightly proximal and on the palmar surface (MCZ specimens), distinguishing this species from all other pipids (Trueb and Cannatella 1986). In addition to unique fingertips, P. parva (and all other pipids except P. pipa and P. snethlageae) have keratinous tips on toes I-III, a relatively rare feature among amphibians (Duellman and Trueb 1994). On the feet of five of the seven species of Pipa, there is an inner metatarsal tubercle, which ranges from well developed (as in P. pipa) to less developed (as in P. aspera). However, the inner metatarsal tubercles are absent altogether in P. parva and P. myersi (Trueb and Cannatella 1986).

Pipa parva has several series of lateral line organs. One series extends from the snout to the anterior margin of each eye, with an additional organ or two associated with the dorsal or ventral margins of the eye. Another series, with vertically oriented organs, commences at each side of the head at the angle of the jaw, and runs posteriorly from the jaw over the forearm and along the ventral side of the flank. A paired, longitudinal series runs from the temporal region of the head down the dorsum. Yet another longitudinal series extends from each forearm along the dorsal side of the flank (Trueb and Cannatella 1986).

The skull is longer than it is wide, and relatively elongate compared to other pipid species, though still possessing the characteristic wedge shape. Unlike most species of Pipa, P. parva does not possess a palatine process of the maxilla or pre-maxilla. In addition, the pre-articular mandibular bones are relatively straight (compared to those of P. snethlageae and P. pipa, which have a medial curve), giving P. parva its ventrally narrow snout. The presacral vertebral column of Pipa parva also shows some differences from other pipids. In all Pipa, vertebrae are imbricate and opisthocoelous. The sacrum and urostyle are fused, and the sacral diapophyses are hugely elongated in the anterior-posterior direction. However, the ventral anterior margin of the presacral I (Atlas) has convex articulation in P. parva (as in P. myersi, and P. snethlageae), while other pipids have straight or somewhat concave articulation (Trueb and Cannatella 1986). The pelvic girdle of Pipa is distinctive as a genus, with only slight modification among species: P. parva has dorsolaterally oriented ilial crests (as is the case for P. pipa and P. snethlageae), rather than the completely depressed or lateral iliac crests found in other species of Pipa. As in all Pipa, Pipa parva has a modified arciferal pectoral girdle (Trueb and Cannatella 1986).

In preserved specimens, these frogs have a dorsally uniform dark brown coloration on the head, back, limbs and associated tubercles. Ventrally, the dark brown fades into a light gray/tan, and may be unspotted or have sparse indistinct spots on the pectoral region (MCZ specimens, Trueb and Cannatella 1986). Some specimens have been reported as brown with tan tubercles and scattered dark brown spots (Trueb and Cannatella 1986), or blackish gray dorsally with obscure darker spots, and grayish white ventrally, with some spotting on the flanks and throat (Ruthven and Gaige 1923). While the feet have the same coloration, the webbing between the fingers and toes is completely transparent (MCZ specimens; Trueb and Cannatella 1986).

Tadpoles of P. parva reach about 40 mm in length. The mouth structure is about half the head width and is terminal, slightly toward the ventral side of the head. Notably, P. parva lacks the opercular flap extending across branchial slit II. Thus, internal gills are absent and forelimb development is external and visible. The skull and jaws are largely composed of embryonic cartilage and are long, broad and flat. Tadpoles are dark gray-brown dorsally, with transparent ventral surfaces (Sokol 1977).

Distribution and Habitat

Country distribution from AmphibiaWeb's database: Colombia, Venezuela


View distribution map in BerkeleyMapper.
Pipa parva occurs in the north of Venezuela and in a small part of northeastern Colombia, at elevations up to 300 m above sea level. The distribution surrounds the Lake Maracaibo Basin. Additionally, this species has been introduced into the Lake Valencia Basin in northern Venezuela. Due to its hardiness, and the fact that P. parva's expansion into central Venezuela has already begun, it is feared that this introduction into the Lake Valencia Basin will lead to quick expansion to river basins farther south, such as those of Orinoco. Like other pipids, this is an aquatic species that lives in lakes, ponds, marshes and other flooded areas. It is able to cross land during rains and so can be found in open grasslands and dry or moist savannas, but not in habitats devoid of water (IUCN 2006).

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors
This species is elusive and exceptionally difficult to observe. It is known to exhibit territorial behavior, with males defending underwater calling sites via visual displays, chasing intruders, jump attacking, and wrestling (Duellman and Trueb 1994).

The reproductive behavior of Pipa parva closely resembles that of other pipids and is nearly identical to that of P. pipa and P. carvalhoi, including the somersault behavior and female dorsal skin brooding. Amplexus is inguinal (the male grabs the female around the waist above the thighs) and occurs while the pair are completely submerged in water. The amplexing pair, led by the female, begins a series of maneuvers where they swim toward (but not reaching) the surface, the female releases eggs mid-way, and then during mid-water turnovers, the male fertilizes the eggs and pushes them into the female's dorsum with his vent region. This cycle is repeated until all the eggs are released, fertilized, and implanted. (Duellman and Trueb 1994).

After the eggs have been fertilized, they are implanted in the skin of the female's dorsum. The epidermis and dermis of the female's back during this time undergo significant change: the egg chambers are highly vascularized and adhere to the single jelly capsule of the egg. The small gills of the developing embryos then engage in gas exchange with the vascularized tissue of mother (Duellman and Trueb 1994). In P. parva, along with P. carvalhoi and P. myersi and unlike other Pipa, the free-living larval stage is still present. After 30 days of dermal brooding, the tadpoles hatch from the mother's skin. Other pipids such as P. pipa undergo direct development, hatching miniature adult frogs instead of larvae (Duellman and Trueb 1994; Sokol 1977). Because of the increased demands of direct developing young, species with direct development usually have only one annual reproductive cycle. However, species such as P. parva that produce tadpoles are able to reproduce several times a year. Captive P. parva females have been recorded to produce three or four clutches per year (Duellman and Trueb 1994).

The tadpoles rest in mid-water with only small and occasional movements of the tail, exercising precise hydrostatic control (Sokol 1977). To feed, these tadpoles employ hyobranchial pumping to gather particles in the water; they are filter feeders. When food is lacking, the larvae attempt to stir the substrate (Duellman and Trueb 1994; Sokol 1977).

The tails of P. parva tadpoles are long, relatively thin, and taper to a point (MCZ specimens). Both the tail and the lungs are important in hydrostatic stabilization. Tadpoles must fill their lungs before they can swim; if P. parva larvae fail to fill their lungs properly, it is a struggle for them to get to the surface and move about (Sokol 1977).

Trends and Threats

The species is resilient and is abundant within its range. It is sometimes controlled as a pest, but this has had a negligible impact on its population (IUCN 2006).

Possible reasons for amphibian decline

General habitat alteration and loss
Habitat modification from deforestation, or logging related activities
Habitat fragmentation

Karyotype, 2n=30 (Cannatella and de Sá 1993).

The species Pipa parva was originally described by Ruthven and Gaige (1923).

The specimens used for observation are located at the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology. The catalog numbers and locality are as follows: Venezuela A-9012, A-44812, A-44813, A-44814, A-136509.


Cannatella, D., and de Sá, R. O. (1993). ''Xenopus laevis as a model organism.'' Systematic Biology, 42, 476-507.

Duellman, W. E., and Trueb., L. (1994). Biology of Amphibians. Johns Hopkins University Press, Maryland.

IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Pipa parva. Accessed on 10 May 2008.

Rabb, G. B., and Rabb, M. S. (1963). ''Additional observations on breeding behavior of the Surinam Toad, Pipa pipa.'' Copeia, 1963(4), 636-642.

Ruthven, A. O., and Gaige, H. T. (1923). ''Description of a new species of Pipa from Venezuela.'' Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 136, 1-2.

Sokol, O. M. (1977). ''The free swimming Pipa larvae, with a review of pipid larvae and pipid phylogeny (Anura: Pipidae).'' Journal of Morphology, 154(3), 357-425.

Trueb, L., and Cannatella, D. C. (1986). ''Systematics, morphology, and phylogeny of genus Pipa (Anura: Pipidae).'' Herpetologica, 42, 412-449.

Originally submitted by: John Abraham (first posted 2008-05-12)
Edited by: Kellie Whittaker (2009-01-22)

Species Account Citation: AmphibiaWeb 2009 Pipa parva <> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed Apr 14, 2024.

Feedback or comments about this page.


Citation: AmphibiaWeb. 2024. <> University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Accessed 14 Apr 2024.

AmphibiaWeb's policy on data use.